Rugby Australia has confirmed it intends to sack Israel Folau barring “compelling mitigating factors” after another controversial social media post.
The post, which was accompanied by religious messages and verses of scripture, was labelled as a “warning” and said “hell awaits” a group including “homosexuals”, “drunks”, “adulterers”, “liars”, “fornicators”, “thieves”, “atheists” and “idolators”.
Folau had earlier posted a critical tweet linking to a news bulletin about Tasmania becoming first state or territory in Australia to make the inclusion of gender optional on birth certificates.
In a statement on Thursday night, Rugby Australia CEO Raelene Castle said both Rugby Australia and NSW Rugby had been attempting to contact Folau over the post but had not received any response.
“Rugby Australia and the New South Wales Rugby Union have made repeated attempts to contact Israel both directly and via his representatives since 6.30pm on Wednesday, and at this point he has failed to communicate directly with either organisation,” the statement read.
“Whilst Israel is entitled to his religious beliefs, the way in which he has expressed these beliefs is inconsistent with the values of the sport. We want to make it clear that he does not speak for the game with his recent social media posts.
“Israel has failed to understand that the expectation of him as a Rugby Australia and NSW Waratahs employee is that he cannot share material on social media that condemns, vilifies or discriminates against people on the basis of their sexuality.
“Rugby is a sport that continuously works to unite people. We want everyone to feel safe and welcome in our game and no vilification based on race, gender, religion or sexuality is acceptable and no language that isolates, divides or insults people based on any of those factors can be tolerated.
“As a code we have made it clear to Israel formally and repeatedly that any social media posts or commentary that is in any way disrespectful to people because of their sexuality will result in disciplinary action.
“In the absence of compelling mitigating factors, it is our intention to terminate his contract.”