Law discussion: World Rugby’s latest clarification proves there is a common-sense approach to officiating
Springboks scrum-half Grant Williams and an inset of Crusaders nine Noah Hotham.
World Rugby’s latest law clarification has shone the spotlight on the governing body’s commitment to a greater spectacle, even if it goes against the lawbook.
This sounds like a bad thing, but in fact, it’s a common-sense approach from World Rugby to put an end to a dreary action in the game that essentially just serviced the lawbook.
New Zealand Rugby question hands in the ruck
So what are we on about here? Well, it’s something that occurs in every single rugby match you will watch, and that’s not hyperbolic. To prove the point, we randomly picked out two matches from this weekend: the United Rugby Championship quarter-final between the Stormers and Cardiff and the Super Rugby Pacific match between the Crusaders and Hurricanes. It took 10 seconds in Cape Town to produce the first example of what New Zealand Rugby was requesting clarity on, and 24 seconds in Christchurch.
The World Rugby statement read: “NZRU have asked: Are the actions of a scrum half moving beyond the back foot of the ruck and moving the ball with their hands consistent with Ruck laws?”
Plain and simple, law 5.11 states that ‘Once a ruck has formed, no player may handle the ball unless they were able to get their hands on the ball before the ruck formed and stay on their feet.’
However, after 10 seconds in Cape Town, Stormers scrum-half Imad Khan reaches into a ruck, uses his hands to roll the ball back before executing a box-kick. However, referee Eoghan Cross doesn’t blast his whistle and award a penalty to Cardiff. Crusaders number nine Noah Hotham did precisely the same thing in Christchurch and also didn’t get penalised.
In both cases, the attacking team had secured possession, and there was no longer a contest for the ball at the breakdown, with Cardiff and the Hurricanes both conceding that there was no longer a point in competing.
World Rugby issues law clarification after New Zealand Rugby request: ‘The contest is clearly over’
World Rugby turns a blind eye to illegal actions
But by the letter of the law, both the Stormers and Crusaders number nines had reached into the breakdown, used their hands and illegally pulled the ball back. This is an incredibly common event in matches nowadays and a change in officiating as half-backs had to use their feet to bring the ball to the back of the ruck – a painstaking, boring and time-sapping action.
However, this all changed a few years ago when officials agreed that when the ball gets stuck in the ruck, but the contest is over – so the defence has conceded that they won’t win possession and are not contesting for it anymore and spread out into their defensive pattern – the scrum-half can in fact use their hands to free the ball up from under the bodies.
Forcing the half-back to use their feet to free up the ball just slowed the game down. So now, when the contest of the breakdown is over, the scrum-half is allowed to use his hands to move the ball to the back of the ruck in a position to either pass it or get into the box-kick position.
World Rugby’s response to NZ Rugby’s request, reads: “The laws referenced should be read alongside the Playing Charter which is a part of the Laws of the Game. Together, they seek to establish “the essential balance between continuity of play and continuity of possession.” The Charter stresses the equal importance in rugby union of both – with nine references to ‘contest’ and eight references to ‘continuity’.
“In the context of the request, the rucks defined suggest a contest for possession is over, the ball secured and then the half back (or player fulfilling that role) is then playing the ball away to ensure continuity. The laws highlighted focus on the contest for possession. Match officials must apply the laws in the context of the Charter as well.
“While the actions of the scrum half/half back do appear to contravene the pure law wordings, there is no material offence caused and so match officials are ensuring match continuity.”
Loose Pass: Experiences that remind you why you fell in love with rugby
Play on
Basically, officials are being encouraged to favour what the Charter states over the lawbook when the contest is clearly over and call ‘Use it’ as soon as the ball has been ‘clearly won by a team at the ruck and is available to be played.’
So let’s look at it a bit more closely in the clip from the Stormers’ match. Cardiff kick off to Damian Willemse, who is dragged down by two defenders. The Welsh outfit opted not to commit any bodies to the ruck from there. Therefore, there is no contest with the ball trapped close to Willemse’s body.
— Jared Wright (@jaredwright17) June 4, 2026
Khan uses his hands to pull the ball to the back and then box-kicks. New Zealand Rugby effectively asks ‘Is this not a ruck?’ It is. ‘Is that not hands in the ruck then?’ Technically, the answer is yes but practically no because the contest is over and the charter wants quick play, flowing rugby and, therefore, there is no point in penalising it.
As detailed above, World Rugby are accepting that by the letter of the law, this is an illegal action, but for the betterment of the game and spectacle, it’s worth ignoring as ‘there is no material offence caused’.
Want more from Planet Rugby? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for world-class coverage you can trust.
A similar sequence of events played out for Hotham against the Hurricanes, and the outcome was the same too. So what impact has this had on the game since the change from World Rugby in 2024? Well, you may have noticed that there are far fewer instances when the referee deems the ball ‘unplayable’ at a ruck.
Law 15.20 reads: “The ruck ends when the ball becomes unplayable. If the referee decides that the ball will probably not emerge within a reasonable time, a scrum is awarded.”
— Jared Wright (@jaredwright17) June 4, 2026
Top New Zealand referee claims World Rugby officials are ‘aligned’ despite differing law trials
Common-sense approach
This used to occur relatively often in matches as scrum-halves were unable to hook the ball backwards from the ruck without using their hands. This still does occur, but it’s more prominent from mauls nowadays and double tackles when the defenders intentionally hold up the ball carrier. With half-backs being allowed to roll the ball to the back of the ruck when there is no contest, it also allows for cleaner distribution and accuracy of passes and kicks.
World Rugby and referees are often accused of not using common sense when it comes to officiating the game, but in this case, they absolutely did, using the Charter instead of strictly sticking to the book. There was no need to change the laws that are already in place or overcomplicate the implementation. Instead, allow the half-backs to take a bit of harmless liberty to get the game moving.
READ MORE: Ben O’Keeffe wants World Rugby to ‘innovate’ by exploring ‘important avenue’ that fans will ‘love’
