Morne Steyn: The man for the job?
Related links
Teams
Also see
It's supposed to be the greatest rivalry in rugby, but very few pundits are backing the Springboks to beat the All Blacks in Dunedin on Saturday.
Most expect the hosts to show Heyneke Meyer and co. why 'total rugby', when executed correctly, will always be superior to the one-dimensional style to which the Boks insist on confining themselves.
The Springboks' stubbornness in sticking to what they believe is a tried-and-tested formula - and by extension their selection policy - has been the greeted by widespread frustration not only in the Republic, but around the world as fans beg to see the Boks use some of the attacking talents at their disposal.
Earlier this week we ran a poll asking who you would pick at 10 and 15 for the Boks. Of the eight options provided, Meyer's preferred combination ranked... a distant seventh.
Less than four per cent of the fans who voted reckon that Morne Steyn and Zane Kirchner are the right men for the job. Overwhelmingly our readers feel that either Johan Goosen or Pat Lambie, or a combination of the two, should be South Africa's playmakers.
It's easy to criticise Steyn's lack of invention, but he is only doing what he is told. And to be fair to Meyer, if South Africa are going to persist with employing their current tactic (and I use the singular form intentionally, because it's abundantly clear there is no 'plan B') then Steyn IS the best choice.
And judging by some comments from the Bulls fly-half this week, the Boks have no intention of changing the approach that brought them their last Tri-Nations title back in 2009.
"We've won a Tri-Nations with the same game-plan and in 2007 we won the World Cup with these tactics. We have to stay with this strategy," he said.
Eh?
So, it worked against equally one-dimensional Argentina and England at a World Cup five years ago so it can't be wrong?
True, the hit-'em-hard-and-kick-it-high approach bore fruit in 2009 when Joe Rokocoko and Sitiveni Sivivatu, who were hopelessly out of form at the time, were found wanting under the high ball. But to simply expect the current crop of Kiwis to wilt under pressure in the same fashion is more than naive, it's just plain foolish.
Every defensive coach in world rugby has seen it all before and has had years and years to come up with the necessary solutions.
But the more we shout, the more the siege mentality in the Bok camp is entrenched. Meyer says he doesn't care that his team have been written off, that he's used to being criticised and has instead highlighted the fact that he is leading an inexperienced team in country where the Boks have not enjoyed much success.
Sure, you can't replace the players he's lost overnight, but surely that is all the more reason to build a new strategy around the next generation of talents at his disposal?
The furore over the Boks living in denial has gone a long way to overshadow the fact that the All Blacks were given an almighty scare by Argentina last week.
As much as that result is a reflection of just how good the Pumas are, if truth be told, the Kiwis weren't at their best and their error count was uncharacteristically high. Some calm heads from experienced players saw them home though as their approach to the game ultimately proved the same point we expect again this weekend: If you keep moving the ball, gaps will eventually open up. Compare that to the Boks' inability to put the Pumas away in both Cape Town and Mendoza.
While this will be South Africa's first visit to Forsyth Barr Stadium, the Springboks' last visit to the deep south and the now defunct 'House of Pain' (Carisbrook) in 2008 resulted in victory. But don't read too much into that, the Boks have won just three times in New Zealand in the professional era.
Some pundits have suggested that this game might be a crossroads for South Africa, arguing that if they get hammered, they'll be forced to rethink their strategy.
But there are too many class players in the visitors' side for this to turn into a massacre. If South Africa come anywhere near winning, the coaching staff will see it as vindication of their outdated thinking and we'll be back to square one. In that case, the real losers will be everyone who wants to see exciting rugby.
Players to watch:
For New Zealand: Officially, Piri Weepu has been handed back the number nine shirt because Aaron Smith was a naughty boy and staying out too late but it would not have been a huge surprise if the World Cup winner had been bumped up from the bench anyway. After a poor Super Rugby season, Mr Fixit has looked much better in a Black jersey (not least because he has lost 10kg) and was a steadying influence when the Kiwis needed calm heads in Wellington. With the hosts looking to play at a high tempo on a dry track, Weepu will be keen to show he can keep up with the pace and regain a regular starting berth. Axed from the team last week for simply not being good enough, Sam Whitelock returns with a point to prove - South Africa's line-out will provide a real test of his skills.
For South Africa: With a grand total of one Premiership game for Bath and 23 minutes against Australia under his belt, Francois Louw has been brought into the Bok starting XV with the specific task of beating Richie McCaw on the ground. No pressure, then. Whilst Flo's inclusion has been welcomed by many as a step in the right direction, the fact that it comes at the expense of Marcell Coetzee - South Africa's best player this year and their only forward with any pace - has only heaped even more pressure onto Louw's shoulders. How many Test tries would Bryan Habana have scored if he had been born in New Zealand? Despite being starved of opportunities to gallop in space, he always finds a way to get involved.
Head-to-head: Incredibly, there are just three players in the All Blacks starting team this weekend that were also in the run-on side when they last played the Springboks in Port Elizabeth last August. One of them, Israel Dagg, must be licking his lips at the prospect of being kicked at by Zane Kirchner. If the SA back three get it even slightly wrong, they'll be punished. The equation is simple: give Dagg, Jane and Savea ammunition and you'll get shot.
Previous results:
2011: South Africa won 18-5 at Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium, Port Elizabeth
2011: New Zealand won 40-7 at Westpac Stadium, Wellington
2010: New Zealand won 29-22 at FNB Stadium, Johannesburg
2010: New Zealand won 31-17 at Westpac Stadium, Wellington
2010: New Zealand won 32-12 at Eden Park, Auckland
2009: South Africa won 32-29 at Rugby Park, Hamilton
2009: South Africa won 31-19 at Absa Stadium, Durban
2009: South Africa won 28-19 at Vodacom Park, Bloemfontein
2008: New Zealand won 19-0 at Newlands
2008: South Africa won 30-28 at Carisbrook, Dunedin
2008: New Zealand won 19-8 at Westpac Stadium, Wellington
2007: New Zealand won 33-6 at Jade Stadium, Christchurch
2007: New Zealand won 26-21 at Absa Stadium, Durban
2006: South Africa won 21-20 at Royal Bafokeng Stadium, Rustenburg
2006: New Zealand won 45-26 at Loftus Versfeld, Pretoria
Prediction: I honestly hope the Boks prove me wrong and provide us with a spectacle worth watching. But on current form, I can only see a home victory. Heyneke Meyer's walkie-talkie to take a beating and New Zealand to win by 14 points.
The teams:
New Zealand: 15 Israel Dagg, 14 Cory Jane, 13 Conrad Smith, 12 Ma'a Nonu, 11 Julian Savea, 10 Aaron Cruden, 9 Piri Weepu, 8 Kieran Read, 7 Richie McCaw (c), 6 Liam Messam, 5 Sam Whitelock, 4 Luke Romano, 3 Owen Franks, 2 Andrew Hore, 1 Tony Woodcock
Replacements:16 Keven Mealamu, 17 Charlie Faumuina, 18 Brodie Retallick, 19 Victor Vito, 20 Aaron Smith, 21 Beauden Barrett, 22 Tamati Ellison.
South Africa: 15 Zane Kirchner, 14 Bryan Habana, 13 Jean de Villiers (c), 12 Frans Steyn, 11 Francois Hougaard, 10 Morne Steyn, 9 Ruan Pienaar, 8 Duane Vermeulen, 7 Willem Alberts, 6 Francois Louw, 5 Juandre Kruger, 4 Flip van der Merwe, 3 Jannie du Plessis, 2 Adriaan Strauss, 1 Tendai Mtawarira.
Replacements: 16 Tiaan Liebenberg, 17 Dean Greyling, 18 Andries Bekker, 19 Marcell Coetzee, 20 Johan Goosen, 21 Juan de Jongh, 22 Pat Lambie.
Date: Saturday, September 15
Venue: Forsyth Barr Stadium, Dunedin
Kick-off: 19:35 (08:35 BST, 07:35 GMT, 09:35 SAST)
Weather:Who cares? The stadium has a roof.
Referee: George Clancy (IRE)
By Ross Hastie







Comments
Fred91 says...
Its going to be a close game...Bok by 3
Posted 09:49 15th September 2012
FTM89 says...
@Jaystarr
I must agree with you and I only agree with this because Brussow is missing...
Posted 08:00 15th September 2012
porridge_time says...
The only way that the Boke will manage to win this is if they front up. Taking on the AB pack for the full 80 is what both Argentina and Australia failed to do.
I'm of the thinking that the ABs are eventually going to hit their straps and someone is going to get hit for 50... it could well be that its this weekend.
Posted 05:53 15th September 2012
volbrechtt says...
All Blacks by 20 or more. I expect the Springboks to be found wanting defensively, in pace, and in discipline by the forwards.
Posted 03:29 15th September 2012
sandal says...
Who are South Africa playing? Can anyone tell me?
Posted 01:18 15th September 2012
MacTavish says...
@jmanngod - Owned. Hardly. Did you check the past results in this article? Going back to 2006 NZ are up 9 to 6 over the past 15 games vs the Boks. I dont call that owned. Complacency will deliver a loss. If you think you are unbeatable then you will get burned. We may have the measure of most teams, but when you get cocky, teams like Aussie, Sth Africa, France and even England can slap you back. We have lost to all of them in recent years. We are NOT going to go unbeaten between here and the next RWC, anytime from the next game onwards is a chance to lose. We are good yes, but not unbeatable mate.
Posted 01:15 15th September 2012
georgesmith says...
Z. Kirchner ain't that bad. I don't understand why the lack of confidence by him lately. M.Steyn, I seriously think should be on the bench and J.Goosen calling the shots.
I feel ABs have not been that good in the championship but rather, opposing teams have offered poor quality. Wallabies have been horrible and Pumas tried hard but... The unforced mistakes and individualism. Overall, the intensity of ABs game is falling down. Springboks need to notice this and target the right areas. Boks have a chance.
Posted 00:59 15th September 2012
StunTheMullet says...
@ jontheref - Allain Rolland and Romain Poite were pretty bad.
Rolland for whistling up 27 odd penalties to destroy the Australia vs. ABs match in Sydney.
Poite for allowing blatant and cynical game slowing tactics by the Argies against the ABs until he finally produced a yellow card at about the 55th minute mark.
Posted 00:26 15th September 2012
ruckingkiwi says...
South Africa are lucky NZ seem to be stuck in reverse at the moment. This could be the first season a team has reversed their way to the title, although I would be wise not to speak too soon. NZ by 18
Posted 23:03 14th September 2012
jmanngod says...
@MacTavish _ really? not an upset? NZ have basically owned SA since the 1990s.
Posted 22:31 14th September 2012
7ton says...
I wouldn't say the game is a forgone conclusion at all. The AB's backline has made a few blunders in previous games and has been chopped and changed and still may not manage to really gel together.
Who knows! SA despite last weeks loss may proove to be NZs toughest test yet and with a bounce of a ball here and there, they are in with a chance and shouldn't be written of.
Posted 20:21 14th September 2012
Kiwikev says...
Just when everyone is prepared to write the Boks off, be wary that they may punish the opposing side.
I pray the AB are not underestimating SA but these predictions of a proper hiding are off IMO.
AB 29 - 25
Posted 18:57 14th September 2012
Euskadi says...
Surprised at the article, not much said about the ABs...more taking shots at the Boks. I never underestimate the Boks, perhaps their game plan is outdated but if there were ever a team to get a game plan spot on it is the Boks, they are also far too proud as individuals and a team to allow themselves to be slaughtered.
On the flip side if ever there is a team to really hammer the traditional foe then it is NZ, they are the only team in the world capable of putting 50 points on the next best. I always think SA is the next best regardless of the IRB rankings!
Would have preferred Ben Smith or even Tamati Ellison starting on the wing instead of Savea. The boks seem capable of containing a power winger like Savea and if he is to put down an early bomb it could be a long night for the youngster.
If NZ dominate the breakdown then it is going to be a convincing win.
NZ by 21
Posted 18:40 14th September 2012
philipjfry says...
@startledwombat: Mate, that's very insulting. I hope for your sake that you were either drunk or caned when you posted, otherwise you are just an antagonistic c**t.
Posted 17:34 14th September 2012
tuffnut says...
A wounded Springbok team is a dangerous one. With so many quartres saying that this game is NZ's already I fear that the opposite will actually happen. SA will turn up to play and NZ will be missing the required hunger to take them down. Springbok's by 8. Goosen to set up a superb try on debut in the second half and announce his arrival on the international stage. ABs to win the remaining games of the tournament.
@SACanuck your comment cracked me up. lol
Go All Blacks!
Posted 17:15 14th September 2012
JayStarr says...
I am a South African, but I will be cheering for the All Blacks this weekend. I want them to smash any idea that HM's idea of "winning rugby" is in any way applicable in 2012 (nevermind 2015) out of the park.
Even I can coach the All Blacks and tell them how to beat this Bok team... All Blacks by 30 +... However, if the AB's can cut out their errors and click, it might be by a record margin. If so, they'll be doing us a favour.
Posted 16:50 14th September 2012
USA_Saffa says...
To be honest, I hope that NZ thrashes us to the point where HM can't hide his incompetence. If I see another pointless kick that simply hands over possession, blatant missed tackles that lead to tries by the opposition (yes you Bekker) or a No 2 who looks unfit and stands around behind the ruck looking confused (yes you Strauss), I will throw up. At this point, I will not be watching this match. 'Physicality' is pointless without brains.
Posted 16:26 14th September 2012
meneer says...
thanks Trinats 2, very kind to us Boks with that score line. But really we struggled against your boys in Perth where we do very well with almost home support, against a team badly depleted by injury. I fondly remember back to that epic win, with a last minute January try at the same ground to be the first team to ever beat the All Blacks there. Sadly even with all the luck HM so fondly refers to created by the most powerful 'muti' we have very little chance of converting even 2 penalties AND I dread watching my beloved Boks get nilled.
Posted 16:10 14th September 2012
ManWarrior says...
@bokkrige - don't stick your neck out to far, Morne night just kick your head for a up-n-under...just kidding bud! I'll join you in the insanity and say the Louw and Vermeulen are gonna find their rythm, Steyn is gonna pass the ball, JDV is gonna run into space and not into the grand stand and the wings are gonna score a few...Bokke by 5, I pray (pray with me new_J4). Go Bokke!
Posted 16:06 14th September 2012
passtheball says...
Wonder why NH refs are doing all the games? Does that mean SH refs will ref the 6 nations? Expect plenty of whistle and partly because of that it will be a close game until about the last 15 minutes when the ABs will pull away by, say, 12?
For a surprise - Habana to get the ball in open play with space and ..... dreams are free.
Posted 15:14 14th September 2012