Trinats2 says...

hybrid187:

Three titles in the 90s (1992, 1994 and 1995)

Posted 10:24 28th June 2012

hybrid187 says...

Reds dominated the 90s ?? How many titles did they win ? Apart from last year when everything fell into place for them (not playing Sharks or Highlanders, where their nearest competition the Saders conveniently missed out .... wait for it.... the Lions and Rebels, thereby handing the Reds a home final) the Reds were the perennial losers in Super Rugby history.

Posted 14:10 27th June 2012

tha_mai says...

Trinats - wasn't you that broke his ankle was it? he's no good for the Wallabies, as was in NZ U-20 last year this is one NZ player you can't buy.

Posted 11:09 26th June 2012

Trinats2 says...

tha_mai

That's all bull, he is checking out property on the Sunny Coast !! another wanna be Aussie !!!

cuw3100:

Only took ONE Aussie team to win it last year !

I'd be all for a Super 10 comp, Reds dominated it in the 90's.

Posted 09:40 26th June 2012

cuw3100 says...

LOL Trinats2 : If they make it a Super 10, only 2 teams from Australia will be there :)

Posted 08:21 26th June 2012

Trinats2 says...

Capedcrusader:

Not another Kiwi whinging !!!! Try have another 7 or 8 injuries, before a rant.

I'd blame your coach for kkeping Dagg on, playing against a very weak team, why would he keep him on ?? And if Read was on side, he wouldn't have had a knock on the head !!!!

Or are you just teeing up excuses !!!

Posted 03:51 26th June 2012

Capedcrusader says...

Just the very reason it shouldn't be the Super12 + 3 also rans. At the business end we lose 3 key key key key players in particular Dagg & Read. NOT a happy chappy SANZAR. Rant:

The winner Australia - O'Neil will be happy he gets his own way all the time. WAKE UP NZRFU

Posted 16:46 25th June 2012