'Where do you think you're going?' Stephen Donald is checked by the SA defence
Related links
Teams
Also see
South Africa, back on their game after last week's blip, have claimed the Tri-Nations with a bludgeoning 32-29 win over New Zealand in Hamilton.
New Zealand fell foul to sucker-punch after sucker-punch, with Francois Steyn landing three penalties from within his own half in the first half alone, as every minute indiscretion from the home side was punished ruthlessly.
The defence functioned again, letting the All Black backs have not a whiff of space. As the second half wore on and the All Blacks' chase of the Boks' lead grew increasingly frantic, the Boks relaxed into an all-too-familiar routine of tackling and waiting for the error to prey on. It's becoming a mental edge they have in that area now as well as a physical one.
Then, on 53 minutes, Jean de Villiers picked off a 50-50 pass as he has done so often for his country, and raced away to finish off the game as a contest under the posts. A minute later, Richie McCaw spilled a simple pass in midfield. In two acts, the contrasting tales of the two teams were told: one of patience and reward for eanest endeavour, the other of creative but futile attempts to move the immovable.
And yet somehow, they ended up clinging on for it. If there is a worry for this Springbok team going forward, it is the propensity to concede late tries which has seeped into their season. Australia managed it three times in three games, New Zealand managed it here to fight their way back from 29-12 down after De Villiers' effort. It was a belting finale.
That was one which, for the first hour, you would never have predicted in a million years. It was the usual Bok story: stealing line-outs, tackling behind the gain-line, forcing penalties, racking up points, kicking deep for territory and chasing hard not to lose it... just generally irritating, frustrating and battering the opposition.
Then there is Frans Steyn. It's a special kind of weapon to have in the arsenal when you can just shrug your shoulders on the award of a penalty on your own 10m line, point to the posts and relax as the ball goes sailing over the bar for three points. It's a hell of a thing to face as a team as well. You could see All Black necks crane as the kicks sailed over their heads, then see the heads click resignedly into place as the flags went up. New Zealand had all the territory in the opening quarter, yet found themselves trailing 9-6, two 50m+ penalties from Steyn and a snap drop goal from namesake Morne to two penalties from Carter.
Then came a classic Springbok try. The ball went up, up, up, the catcher - this time the unfortunate Joe Rokocoko - dropped it, Bakkies Botha took it on and Fourie du Preez sniped from the ruck to dive over the line and score. Morne Steyn landed his kick - not a single place-kick from either team was missed all day - and it was 16-6.
That sparked the All Blacks into action. Within two minutes the ball was being run by Sitiveni Sivivatu from his own 22, who got a little bit of change from his run but once again found his option so well closed down that there was never any danger. It was a feature of the rest of the half: the most telling moment coming when Stephen Donald took a ball on a charge and found it stripped from him expertly in the tackle.
A further double-exchange of penalties rounded off the half, with another monster from Frans and a chip from Morne countering two from Carter.
But again, New Zealand were left frustrated by the Bok defence right at the half's close. Having engineered a short line-out to good effect - full line-outs were a catastrophe for the ABs all day - the All Black forwards took the ball up close to the line, but it was too slow coming out and Carter's grubber was rendered ineffective by the sheer depth of the green-clad cover. New Zealand trailed by ten at the break and without a single try to their account in a match they needed to win and score four tries in. Only an effort akin to the infamous Paris blitz of November 2004 could have done the second-half job.
Instead, and following a televised half-time interview with Wayne Smith which had 'what on earth can we do' radiating from his every syllable, it was the Boks who came desperately close to scoring. Sivivatu mis-fielded a high kick, Morne Steyn seized upon it and set Bismarck du Plessis on his way to the line where he was tackled just short. Had Bakkies Botha not been quite so intent on cleaning out Mils Muliaina and looked to take an offload, he would surely have scored.
The body blows kept coming. Sivivatu panic-passed and nearly let the Boks get away again. John Smit put in a monster hit on Brad Thorn which even earned a handshake of admiration from the lock. New Zealand fluency faltered under the pressure. A Bok score was inevitable.
Finally De Villiers' sense for an intercept served him once again, in what will be his last match in green for some time, and the All Blacks could only look on distraught as he raced away, with Morne Steyn's conversion making it 29-12. Just after the restart came McCaw's spilled pass. It was all over?
Not quite. As McCaw said immediately afterwards when quizzed on the last half-hour: "I wish we could have done it from the start."
Isaia Toeava's impact as he came on for Donald was immediate, as he took on a Ma'a Nonu offload and fed Sivivatu for a quick counter-try, with Carter converting expertly from the touchline. New Zealand's fluency upped as the Boks seemed content to sit back and try and soak it up. Carter landed another penalty and the All Blacks were back to within a score.
The Boks stormed into action once again, hounding Rokocoko under a high kick, charging up on Cowan for the clearance and with Du Plessis so nearly creating a try with a charge-down. A penalty was conceded in desperation and Morne Steyn restored the ten-point cushion.
Back came the home side, with flickers of 2004 in their speed and width. Breathless stuff abounded as the ball spun from one side to the other, with the green blanket finally stretched. Carter put in a super cross-kick and all McCaw had to do watch catch and fall for the try with two minutes to go. It usually takes a kicker a minute to prepare for a touchline conversion with no guarantee of success. Carter took 20 seconds and made it look nonchalant.
Still the black waves of pressure crashed, with width now the name of the game and with the forwards operating in pods on both sides. The hooter sounded. Carter got the ball and cross-kicked again. Long, long it sailed, curving downwards towards Kieran Read's outstretched hands, with the green defence scrambling across once more... but it was just too long. About a yard. It wasn't the hardest yard this Bok team has managed in this tournament, but it was the winning one.
Man of the match: Kieran Read, Dan Carter, Tony Woodcock and Ma'a Nonu all shone for New Zealand, while Pierre Spies, Schalk Burger, John Smit and Jean de Villiers were all on top form in green. But once again, as he has done so many times, Fourie du Preez controlled the game so well from the rucks, scrums and line-outs. He was the man to provide most of the Boks' winning platform.
Moment of the match: Many moments to consider in an excellent game. But for sheer individuality and brilliance, we'll plump for Dan Carter's hurried late touchline conversion which gave the All Blacks a fighting chance in the final two minutes. Twenty seconds to line-up and land a touchline conversion is awesome.
Villain of the match: Far too much good stuff here to even consider villainy. Even when Bakkies Botha was admonished for some skullduggery, his 'thanks sir' response to Nigel Owens was too comical to remember what the admonishment was even for!
The scorers:
For New Zealand:
Tries: Sivivatu, McCaw
Cons: Carter 2
Pens: Carter 5
For South Africa:
Tries: Du Preez, De Villiers
Cons: M. Steyn 2
Pens: F. Steyn 3, M.Steyn 2
Drop goal: M. Steyn
New Zealand: 15 Mils Muliaina, 14 Josevata Rokocoko, 13 Ma'a Nonu, 12 Stephen Donald, 11 Sitiveni Sivivatu, 10 Dan Carter, 9 Jimmy Cowan, 8 Kieran Read, 7 Richie McCaw (c), 6 Jerome Kaino, 5 Isaac Ross, 4 Brad Thorn, 3 Owen Franks, 2 Andrew Hore, 1 Tony Woodcock.
Replacements: 16 Aled de Malmanche, 17 John Afoa, 18 Adam Thomson, 19 Rodney So'oialo, 20 Brendon Leonard, 21 Isaia Toeava, 22 Cory Jane.
South Africa: 15 Frans Steyn, 14 Odwa Ndungane, 13 Jaque Fourie, 12 Jean de Villiers, 11 Bryan Habana, 10 Morné Steyn, 9 Fourie du Preez, 8 Pierre Spies, 7 Juan Smith, 6 Heinrich Brüssow, 5 Victor Matfield, 4 Bakkies Botha, 3 John Smit (captain), 2 Bismarck du Plessis, 1 Tendai Mtawarira.
Replacements: 16 Chiliboy Ralepelle, 17 Jannie du Plessis, 18 Danie Rossouw, 19 Schalk Burger, 20 Ricky Januarie, 21 Adi Jacobs, 22 Ruan Pienaar.
Referee: Nigel Owens (Wales)
Assistant referees: Wayne Barnes (England), Stuart Dickinson (Australia)
TMO: George Ayoub (Australia)
By Danny Stephens







Comments
Trinats says...
EddieO
Francois Steyn is a great RUGBY player !!!. at full back in 20 plus test you'd expect him to have trys in double figures ??? how many has he scored ??? I'd say none but I could be wrong (I was once before). He lacks in defense when in the line, have a look at the breaks through him, but makes up with the boot. The only Aussie side he'd get into are the soccceroos.
LEEBOK you cyclops, I not even going to entertain a response to your post. Whomever is typing your posts for you should be ashamed.
Posted 12:20 14th September 2009
rob_icepick says...
gsvanzyl right on bru. I'm getting t-shirts made, you boys in? hahah
Someone who can kick goals from 60 metres... gee yeah that's way too easy. I smell a lot of sore losers and a lot of 'critics' eating humble pie.
The euphoria is sublime.
Posted 10:44 14th September 2009
leebok says...
Trinats, you must be on the IRB payroll, or youre a muppet. Boks won despite clear bias towards other teams. I was going to boycott the wooden spoon game next week while the boks polish the trophy, but I will be keen to see who the IRB are supporting this week.
Posted 09:22 14th September 2009
EdwinO says...
Trinats............. someone who can kick, but not play rugby? Are you sure you are talking about Francois Steyn? What would Aussie or NZ pay to have him on their team! Steyn was not selected for the Boks on his long range kicking ability alone. This was the only test where his kicking had a bearing on the outcome. I honestly doubt your rugby knowledge.
I sincerely hope that the Kiwi's give you guys a thorough thrashing next week. If only to hear your whinging afterwards. Most Saffa's would support NZ anyway. Mainly because we cannot stand Aussie arrogance.
Posted 08:53 14th September 2009
gsvanzyl says...
Lets see...
1) World no 1 ranking... check
2) World Cup... check
3) Series win against the B&I Lions... check
4) Tri-nations... check
5) Super 14... check
6) World 7's tournament
Posted 08:22 14th September 2009
Trinats says...
Wally mate, Disillusioned ??? I must have missed my daily pills again, or you have this time.
I am neutral. I dislike the Saffas and the Kiwis equally !!!!
I was neutral watching the game, as It had no bearing on the Wallabies, and I couldn't care who won. I was just hoping for an exciting game of rugby, but wasn't the case. The way things are going, all we need is someone who can kick (who can't play rugby) from 60 + meters and you win, too easy !!!!.
SA would have won the tri nations next week when we beat the kiwis. I thought the Kiwis would have won as the saffas look tired against us and the kiwis with a break. I guess they lost it with the 10 & 12 combo experiment just as we did with Gits and Ashley-Cooper in Perth. Continuity by the springboks was the secret to success. I just hope they can't keep it going and Matfield/Smith/Botha have all retired by 2011.
Wallabies to beat Kiwis by 30 points !!!!!! now I'm disillusioned !!!!
Once again congrats to SA
Posted 07:21 14th September 2009
Wallaroo says...
Congrats Boks, a well deserved win.
This competition only has one thing left to deliver, Aussie snatching 2nd place and the world will be a better place.
Justice I completely agree that we as the premier rugby nations should stick together. I certainly believe that the Boks are coping the rough end of the pineapple, indicated by definite imbalances in the citing and ban processes, non Saffa commentators comments and referees body language ¿ however I think that the Saffas need to stop blaming us or the Kiwi¿s. IMO it is coming from the IRB who obviously have a chip on their shoulder and a point to prove.
Don¿t worry about Trinats he¿s clearly delusional one day in total opposition to South Africa and the next day a neutral.
FYI Australia doesn¿t have neutrals we either support the Kiwis or the Boks but never either, predominately the Kiwis though.
Having said that I think that the pendulum is starting to swing in South Africa¿s favour, as it becomes more apparent that we have a lot more in common with Saffas than we do Kiwis.
Anyway enough rambling, well done, bring on 2011.
GO THE WALLABIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted 01:56 14th September 2009
SuperBok07 says...
@Trinats
You sound as "Neutral" as Paddy O'Brien, Heaven help any Springbok side that takes to the field if they are being reffed by "Neutrals" such as yourself.
As for the first half the ref was a joke and it was embarrassing to watch how soft the penalties were against SA, even the Kiwi commentators were lost for words at some of the decisions. Thank goodness we have players that can convert penalties from long range and if that is what it takes to win a match then so be it, because we sure as hell don¿t get any handouts from anyone.
As for the second half what a cracker, you can always rely on the Kiwis to get up in your face and boy did they turn it on, had me worried there at one stage.
PDV You have a mouth like a storm trooper but you seem to be doing something right, keep up the good work, Boks you have my utmost respect.
Posted 18:49 13th September 2009
justice_4_all says...
Guys here's the point as I see it: the 3 greatest rugby playing nations have to stick together against an irb where we are massively under-represented. The irb are the bad guys. We can only fix things when we correct the imbalance in representation (and get rid of some of the geriatrics in their Rotary ties). Yes I am concerned about some of the decisions in the game (foot not in touch, 50m clearance/offside call, 2 penalties at restart) but I want to watch the plays slowly a couple of times and maybe ask Johnathon Kaplan or Mark Laurence on www.sareferees.co.za long before I mouth off half cocked on a public forum where the half baked comments will tend to split the groups who need to work together to change the irb. Maybe I am humble because I made 3 mistakes (that I know of) reffing a schoolboy game myself on the same day. It's hard to get it 100% right at any level. Mostly, I am concerned about the apparent imbalance in banning. I didn't want Giteau banned for his dangerous barge. He does NOT have form and I want to see the Boks play against him on the field, not beat him in some crony strewn excuse for a judicial process that makes a mockery of justice. The Southern Hemishere needs to stick together inspite of the crap administration of the sport that is imposed from Dublin.
Posted 14:50 13th September 2009
Trinats says...
Typical response from the saffa's, on this post, the worst winners and losers in sport. (bar a few, Justice 4 all, I have a new found respect for you) The ref was fine, not great but they never are. It's the home advantage, the ref always sides the home team. The whole world is against you South Africa !! LOL You just have to look at the SA v Wallabies game in Newlands (3 sin bins to austraila) I had a dummy spit at the time but built a bridge and got over it. Maybe you need to dish out a few more gold watches to the Welsh refs !!!
In the Rugby League here, they have two refs on the field this year, and they still get calls wrong. So bite your tongue respect the refs call and move on. Owens had a good game, watch it again with both eyes open!!!!.
It was an OK game, as a neutral, to watch. I thought the kicking from SA was spot on, and won them the game, again, however ruining the game as a spectacle. Kicking from 60 meters, great rugby, NOT! I have to agree with ruggers, 1 point for drop goal, and 2 for a penalty or make a try 6 points ????
Well done to SA, you where the best team this year and deserved the title.
Posted 10:03 13th September 2009
boknigh says...
Why not ref bash...he thoroughly deserves it. Nigel Ownes should be demoted to Division 2 rugby in the USA...he is that poor. Perhaps Danny can join him there for some reporting. Once again the Boks have to win despite the refs ambitions! It is getting old playing against 16 men. Come on Paddy, clean up house. Barnes even managed to continue his poor run from the sidelines. Boy he's a gem, isn't he?
The score should have been greater in the Boks' favour. But we will take it an smile and say thank you sir. Thanks for nothing. We did it without your help, or even your honesty.
Posted 05:45 13th September 2009
rugbyphile says...
Well done Boks -you beat 15 All Blacks and at least 2 officials (Wayne, if you catch the ball with your foot in the air and inside the field, then put it out, it's a lineout to the other side--) and as for the offsides call when the kicker was about to put Ndungane onsides when he was still 45m from the ball, and McCaw who you can only imagine the ref must have thought had a green jumper on as he was always on the SA side of the ruck with his back to the SA defensive line, All Blacks diving over most rucks with no problems,Cowan always in front of the ball at the SA put in, grabbing and harassing Du Preez while the ball ws still in, the ref so often finding(?) a mistake whenever SA were metres from the NZ line and in possession, there is something more than slightly off in world rugby and SA should not have to face it game after game---
it spoils the game win or lose --so call me a sore loser?--? or watch the replay and an objective viewer will have to admit there is an issue--
Posted 04:45 13th September 2009
Seabass says...
Nigel Owens was too whistle and penelty happy. Ever heard of a re-set scrum Nigel? Must not have taken his small man pill, he was certainly trying to make up for something. Well done Boks, glad you won the Tri-Nations and put away New Zealand, although cudos to NZ for a brave fightback and at least their annoucers arent' 1/10th as bad as those Aus whinners.
Posted 03:17 13th September 2009
WillieJohn says...
All this talk about the ref. He had an excellent, but not quite flawless, game. A great game and all these people can do is have a go at the ref. Pathetic.
Posted 02:30 13th September 2009
boksmashoffice says...
Excellent win for the Bokke. For me the scrum is becoming an area of concern. I would like to see a specialist scrum coach working with the Bokke (Os).
I would like also like to see the Bokke scoring more tries from 6 and 7 phases onwards. We had chances to put the game beyond the ALL Blacks but for simple mistakes
It excites me to think that we will get better and better.
steyn and De Villliers will be missed by SA as i believe Jacobs cannot cut the nustard at the level. Maybe Wynard Olivier should be given a chance to work with Fourie. I also feel we need a better back up right wing as Odwa is not internationl level winger.
The Autumn tour I hope will be seen as a development tour where fringe players will be given a chance to put their hands up
I am very excited and can't wait for the Bokke to tour Europe
Very happy and proud Saffa
Posted 00:19 13th September 2009
slord182 says...
I'd like to dedicate South Africa's win tonight to Danny Stephens. Our harshest critic. Just knowing you're sitting in the corner of some room sucking on sour grapes makes this Tri Nation victory so much sweeter. Ha ha, suck it Stephen's.
Posted 00:15 13th September 2009
bokfan says...
Whilst I enjoyed the game and felt that the Ab put up a gallant effort, I found myself haunted by the refs blatant bias which kept the them in the game. The bad penny calls were just pathetic. It wasn't until a knock on was no longer a knock on, forward passes became legal and 60 yard clearing kicks deemed players to be off side that I began to find myself getting really angry. I for one am really glad that others share in my disappointment in the way the game was adjudicated. it was without question a game that should never have been close. Mr. Owens should be barred from reffing any future games. The fact is that if he contends that he was being fair, then he's simply unqualified to ref a game of this caliber. We should continue with our protests. If we don't, the Bokke will always be held to a different set of rules and standards by unfair refs and games that we'd convincingly put to bed will continue to be as close as this one was. Worse yet, such games may even be lost. This would be a real travesty! It would take the spirit of true sportsmanship out of a game that despite being played by hooligans, is still supposed to be played and officiated by gentleman. Rugby is a game of 15 v 15. Today, in spite of two yellows being overlooked, the Bokke triumphed over a very strong 16 man team. Grangats to all you champs who held out and showed the world that despite all attempts to stop you, the cream has once again risen to the top.
Posted 22:47 12th September 2009
simondup says...
Moment of the Match : Dan Carter's hurried late touchline conversion
You must be joking is that the best you can do? Not the 50+M Bok penalties or the Carter cross kick for the try.
Posted 22:26 12th September 2009
justice_4_all says...
@asharpe, How juvenile: "All Blacks (19) / Referee Owens (10)" and this: "Nah, let's bash refs. They may just think they are doing a good job if we don't."
If you ever grow up, you'll probably throw a drink the ref's face as recently happened and cost South Africa Willie Roos. We need refs to help us develop the next generations of Boks. Why don't you go and take a ref qualification or at least write your questions respectfully to the duty ref on www.sareferees.co.za instead of filling these pages with your drivel and otherwise using up space and oxygen that could be usefully employed....you too leebok!
Posted 21:07 12th September 2009
asharpe says...
All Blacks (19) / Referee Owens (10) - South Africa (32)
P.S. Did Sitiveni Sivivatu ground that ball? Ref Owens assumed he did although he was 18m behind play and the grounding unsighted. He must be very far sighted as he couldn't do the same from 3m away for Du Preez's try, which he had to refer. And that 3 pointer after the Spies clearance?
Nah, let's bash refs. They may just think they are doing a good job if we don't. And I'll definetly vote for hawk-eye and Video Referees to make line decisions.
Posted 18:52 12th September 2009