Planet Rugby

The TMO - fairness or perfection?

18th January 2014 23:40

Share:

Referee TMO call

TMO referrals: Necessary evil or overkill?

Questions have been raised over the frequency and duration of TMO referrals under the expanded IRB protocols. Is there a solution?

There seems to be a lot more referring than refereeing going on in elite rugby these days. With the expanded remit of the Television Match Official, officials are "going upstairs" more and more, and taking longer and longer to do so. It's something of a vicious circle for rugby's top administrators: there is uproar when a referee makes a mistake, but grumblings of disquiet when the TMO is used repeatedly. The solution lies somewhere in between.

Fundamentally, the TMO is an important and positive aspect of the modern game. Professional rugby matches often hinge on minute margins, with the consequences of victory or defeat massive by contrast; all the more so in tournaments like the Heineken Cup.

Referees are under huge pressure to get decisions right; it's imperative that matches are not affected - let alone decided - by an incorrect call, and equally vital that teams gain in-game benefit from their opponents' transgressions. Hardly surprising, then, that some officials are tempted to go upstairs where even a modicum of doubt exists.

But this isn't refereeing. Second only to their duty of care for the players, the referee's primary role is that of a decision maker. The TMO is there as a back-up; a support mechanism for incidents where officials can't be sure of the correct course of action. It's an insurance policy rather than an arbitrator's first port of call.

The problems surface, though, when referees become frightened of acting decisively; shirking the responsibility for a simple ruling. This is outright over-reliance, and it should be causing concern to the IRB and their referees' manager Joel Jutge.

Saturday's clash at Allianz Park between Saracens and Connacht showcased the most ludicrous example of this in action. Referee Leighton Hodges checked with his TMO (Gareth Simmonds) after visiting prop Nathan White had liberally applied his studs to the upper body and face of Brad Barritt. There followed a baffling series of exchanges, where both Hodges and Simmonds bounced questions off one another in an embarrassing show of buck-passing.

Everyone watching the big screen replays on the pitch, in the stands and from their living rooms could see "clear and obvious" contact between White's boot and Barritt's cheek. The fact that Ospreys lock Ian Evans had seen red the night before for a stamp on the face of an opponent undoubtedly played a part in the reluctance of the officials. Neither referee nor TMO wanted to make that call, and in the end made the wrong one - White was sin-binned rather than sent off.

Sadly, this sort of back-and-forth interaction is indicative of the way elite officiating is headed. The net result? Minutes are wasted, supporters grow impatient, and players inevitably start to lose confidence in the referee and his authority. That is dangerous ground; particularly where foul play is concerned - individuals may take the law into their own hands if they feel the referee does not have his finger on the pulse.

And though it is a bugbear of many spectators; it's a pain in the posterior for those players too. They don't want to spend minutes at a time standing in the cold while officials ponder what everyone else can see.

Statistics from last year's Rugby Championship - the first major tournament to fall under the jurisdiction of the expanded TMO protocols - published by the IRB showed that there were 34 referrals in total. That's 26 more than there were in 2012, and 29 more than 2011 (though this was before the inclusion of Argentina in the tournament, ergo less matches were played).

That's a big increase, and it can cause frustrating disruptions during play, with games breaking up more often and lasting longer as a result.

So how do we arrest this slide towards over-reliance on technology and dearth of decision-making without allowing officiating errors alter games? Imagine the outcry from fans if the IRB restricted TMO usage, and an error was made by a referee against their team. Suppose we revert to the original, more finely-focussed protocol, and a knock-on or infringement from a previous phase of play was not reviewed?

Well, this is sure to be an unpopular view, but I believe that to be a price worth paying - unless, of course, the IRB and its unions can coach referees away from this tendency to check everything under the sun.

For their part, referees put in a tremendous amount of work to better themselves, their knowledge and their application of the laws. Mistakes will happen - we're dealing with people not computers - but Jutge and his elite panel are striving for consistency; something they have rightly identified as a problem. We need to place more faith in their capabilities, and understand that omnipotent precision is impossible.

Some will ask why we should accept errors when the stakes are so high, but which would they rather have? A culture where many referees are afraid to do their jobs and make decisions, to the detriment of the game, or one where we encourage - potentially through restrictive measures - them to take responsibility, and check only what they and their assistants are unsure of?

Perhaps admitting mistakes happen, and that robotic, across-the-board flawlessness is unrealistic is too cavalier an attitude to adopt in the hyper-modern sphere of elite rugby. I'd argue the sport should be mature enough to realise that no amount of protocol can wipe out such faults.

In the end, it boils down to one question: do we want fairness or perfection from our referees? That's a question only the IRB can answer, but I certainly know which I'd prefer.

By Jamie Lyall
@JLyall93

Forthcoming Fixtures
FixtureDetails
All times are local
Super Rugby
Saturday , July 26
Waratahs vs BrumbiesWaratahs vs Brumbies Preview
More Super Rugby fixtures
Recent Results
FixtureDetails
All times are local
Super Rugby
Saturday , July 26
Crusaders 38 - 6 SharksCrusaders vs Sharks Report
Saturday , July 19
Brumbies 32 - 30 ChiefsBrumbies vs Chiefs Report
Sharks 31 - 27 HighlandersSharks vs Highlanders Report
Saturday , July 12
Crusaders 34 - 8 HighlandersCrusaders vs Highlanders Report
Reds 3 - 34 WaratahsReds vs Waratahs Report
Lions 60 - 25 CheetahsLions vs Cheetahs Report
Stormers 10 - 34 SharksStormers vs Sharks Report
Friday , July 11
Blues 8 - 11 ChiefsBlues vs Chiefs Report
Brumbies 47 - 25 Western ForceBrumbies vs Western Force Report
Bulls 40 - 7 Melbourne RebelsBulls vs Melbourne Rebels Report
Sunday , July 6
Waratahs 44 - 16 HighlandersWaratahs vs Highlanders Report
Saturday , July 5
Crusaders 21 - 13 BluesCrusaders vs Blues Report
Western Force 30 - 20 RedsWestern Force vs Reds Report
Stormers 16 - 0 BullsStormers vs Bulls Report
Cheetahs 27 - 20 SharksCheetahs vs Sharks Report
Friday , July 4
Chiefs 24 - 16 HurricanesChiefs vs Hurricanes Report
Lions 34 - 17 Melbourne RebelsLions vs Melbourne Rebels Report
More Super Rugby results
International Match
Saturday , June 28
South Africa 55 - 6 ScotlandSouth Africa vs Scotland Report
More International Match results
Super Rugby
Hurricanes 16 - 9 CrusadersHurricanes vs Crusaders Report
Waratahs 39 - 8 BrumbiesWaratahs vs Brumbies Report
Western Force 14 - 40 BluesWestern Force vs Blues Report
Friday , June 27
Highlanders 29 - 25 ChiefsHighlanders vs Chiefs Report
Melbourne Rebels 20 - 36 RedsMelbourne Rebels vs Reds Report
More Super Rugby results
International Match
Saturday , June 21
Australia 39 - 13 FranceAustralia vs France Report
New Zealand 36 - 13 EnglandNew Zealand vs England Report
More International Match results
Aviva Premiership Table
PosTeamPPts
1Bath00
2Exeter00
3Gloucester00
4Harlequins00
5Leicester Tigers00