In the second installment of a series of exclusive columns for Planet Rugby, former England prop Phil Vickery examines England's chances in Johannesburg.
With England embarking on what many would call an 'old-fashioned tour' of South Africa, the Raging Bull will be sharing his thoughts on the three-Test Series over the next month.
Phil Vickery is an Official Ambassador of Wooden Spoon, the leading Rugby Charity. 'Spoon' is a children's charity founded in 1983, dedicated to helping disadvantaged children and young people across the British Isles live happier, richer lives. 'Spoon' partner with the UK rugby community, and during our first 25 years, over half a million young people benefited form over £18 million of charitable support. WS is proud of its legacy, the work it does, and the ambitious plans for the future. Visit www.woodenspoon.com for further details.
Well, Saturday went pretty much as we thought it might - an attritional war with South Africa's extra bulk being the deciding factor. Despite this, many good things came from the England side: the debut performance of Joe Marler; the robust game of Manu Tuilagi and also the setpiece - which went a lot better than some had feared.
Despite this, England aided and abetted their own downfall. There's an old adage in rugby that good chasing defines good kicking and England's kick chasing was woeful and disorganised, in stark contrast with the South African side, who chased with purpose and intent. Stuart Lancaster's attention to detail in his tenure has been exceptional and I cannot understand why the importance of the chase has been overlooked, but I'm sure it's something they'll look hard and strong at during the week.
Tom Johnson also went well - industrious, surprisingly nimble and very technically gifted. The other flank, Chris Robshaw, showed just what an effective international he is becoming. People have long lamented England's perceived lack of a traditional 7, but Robshaw's workrate, intelligence and leadership is making an absolute mockery of those comments. He is both an exceptional Test player and leader.
True to form, Stuart has stuck with the majority of players used in the first Test, but I'm delighted to see a first start for the incredible talents of Jonathan Joseph. Many have compared JJ's footwork to that of Jeremy Guscott and the parallel is there for all to see. Now I'm a front rower so commenting on back play is normally out of my job description, but I have seen enough to be convinced this man has the potential to be in England's 3/4 line for years to come.
By saying that, moving Tuilagi to inside centre robs England of a second kicking option in the 12 channel, something you'd think they may have wanted on the Highveld (Ellis Park is very much 'at altitude') but Flood will offer more both variety and more risk at 10, and perhaps this is a show of intent that England will play a more running based game.
I also saw glimpses of Mike Brown's Premiership form for Quins despite the missed tackle that broke his thumb. With SA using a high aerial game, Lancaster's strategy in effectively having two full-backs was a good one, and I'm sure Alex Goode will feature off the bench on Saturday.
The midweek side impressed greatly although we have to remember they were playing a scratch side. Thomas Waldrom added massive yards from the base, both locks were very impressive and elsewhere, Christian Wade showed just what promise he has with a superb hat trick.
Ellis Park again will be a massive test of this young England side. Durban, for all its colour and vibrancy, is at sea level. When you move up to the Highveld, you move up another gear altogether in terms of fitness requirements. Nothing will prepare these youngsters for the feeling they will have after 15 minutes; when their throats are on fire and their legs are anchored to the turf through fatigue.
If England were to win a Test, I always fancied it would be the first one, and I believe it'll take a Herculean effort to succeed in Jo-burg. However, with the right game plan, I'm sure we have the personnel to succeed and here's hoping it'll be every bit as thrilling as the first test!.
Cheers,
Vicks
Phil Vickery MBE won 73 Test caps for England and five for the British and Irish Lions. He was part of England's 2003 World Cup-winning team and captained the side to the World Cup Final in 2007.








Comments
APV1 says...
@ gazzabok - one of the few good things to come out of the result...
Your donation to The Wooden Spoon.
@ Chopper - you're probably right about the stats, although the Boks were bigger.
Posted 12:02 18th June 2012
melkdave says...
Annother good article ,by raging bull ,and yes the extra bulk in the english subs will help offset the SA power game .As to the midweek matches ,also agree ,the players have impressed overall.Both games really you would expect England to win hamesomely ,and all though struggled a bit at times in the 1st game(midweek) where always in control .So not a to bad a showing for their 1st game.I do however expect improvment,and a more commanding performance for the 2nd .Also i think posters have the pack wieghts wrong SA pack is clearly hevier and bigger ,and was 912kg to Englands 889kg i beleive
Posted 16:02 17th June 2012
bokbevok says...
Phil are you deluded that the midweek team impresses immensely . The England fringe players couldn't dictate how they wanted to play against third tiers SA players ( largely back up voda com players.
I would say disappointed immensely as not mug to fall back on. If that was great play to you then you will never compete against SH teams at that standard.
Frustrating to say the least if you were a Pom supporter I would guess.
Posted 13:54 16th June 2012
TheRussian says...
When it comes to scrums size isn't everything, NZ have traditionally had lesser pack weights than most nations. Yes you need size to be effective, but I would say tecnique anbd consistancy are more improtant. Plus all round ball handling, fitness and passing skills are better than just being a big munter. Too many countries these days use their forwards to trudge from set play to set play would like to see more variety. Aussie and England are a good example of this.
Posted 11:44 16th June 2012
Ruggernaut says...
Substitutions can make a HUGE difference. Phil is absolutely right in his comments about the impact Strauss and Oosthuizen made when they came on. But I still think (and this is coming from an SA supporter) that England have a very powerful pack. For some reason they are not getting the recognition they really deserve. They're also very mobile around the field. I was very, very impressed with the way they competed at the break downs. It's something that I hope the Boks worked on during this week, because this is one of the areas where England definately performed better in the first test.
Posted 20:28 15th June 2012
RugbyLeRoux says...
Nah Phil was referring to the monsterous form of alberts, Frankenstein and terminator love child!
Posted 20:26 15th June 2012
letsgoboks says...
Nice column for england.
Would be good to have one for SA. Preferably not a South African forward though :D
Posted 16:40 15th June 2012
amaboko says...
It is easier for him to talk about bulk and in change praise the qualities of the bulky adopted English like Tuilagi and Waldrom. The english can adopt an entire pacific nations squad and they`ll not beat SA. Because the boks are not fat or bulky they are muscular. So much more work in the gym and on the field if the poms want a victory against the likes of SA or NZ.The boks will win but hardly and not because of the English but because of their outdated game plan. Mr Meyer please have to guts to try running rugby not just kicks and banging at the opposite defensive.
Posted 15:20 15th June 2012
Chopper says...
Sorry but I think you'll find most of the Springbok weights were incorrect when they were listed live on TV. With the exception of Willem Alberts who was listed 1kg heavier at 120kg's, but most of them were off.
The worst case was JP Pietersen who I think they listed at 85 or 86kg when he is in fact, according to the Sharks website 102kg.
I tallied up the weights listed on sarugby.co.za and the couple that weren't listed there from their respective unions and got a total of 909kg. Now I now their weights may fluctuate slightly but not by about 40kg.
I think the Springbok pack was listed in and around 860 - had a couple of pints by that stage.
I'm expect that it's debatable they got the weights of the English pack right as well.
Posted 15:12 15th June 2012
NHsaints says...
Phil was clearly referring to the 15kg defecit when mears and PDJ came on compared to the SA subs, because that's when their pack started to dominate...
Posted 14:48 15th June 2012
gazzabok says...
The English are delusional. That was't a competition once the Boks settled into the game.
Boks will win by 20+ tomorrow. If not, note this comment and I will donate 10 quid to Wooden Spoon.
Posted 13:12 15th June 2012
benski says...
@APV1... Spot on, Paul DJ got munted, he's not big enough as a prop against these guys.
Posted 12:51 15th June 2012
APV1 says...
With regards to the "extra bulk" comments, I see it as the impact the Bok bench had over ours. There's no doubt that Strauss and Oosthuizen were bigger and better than Mears and D-J. No doubt at all. They scrummaged better and were hugely influential on the result.
Lee Mears - 98kg, 5'9"
Paul D-J - 116kg, 6'2"
Coenie Oosthuizen - 127kg, 6'0"
Adriaan Strauss - 102kg, 6'1"
So we gave away 2 inches in height, but 15kg in weight!
That's the extra bulk he was referring to, as prior to the subs, the packs were more evenly matched.
Posted 11:48 15th June 2012
latin says...
nice column phil. i know its form an english perspective, but nothing about the boks' efforts? dont you think you should at least say something about them?
Posted 11:27 15th June 2012
APV1 says...
Once again, an excellent column. Real astute observations and some realistic and honest appraisals.
I'm also glad that this is still keeping him out of the commentary box..!
;-)
Posted 11:12 15th June 2012
leebok says...
Extra bulk!! I think you will find Englands pack are heavier than the boks so its got nothing to do with bulk. Skill and desire mor elike.
Posted 10:50 15th June 2012
Sharkyzulu says...
Good, balanced commentary, Phil!
However what extra bulk were you referring to? England's pack outweighed South Africa's! Just goes to show that size isn't everything... ;-)
Looking forward to the game tomorrow!
Posted 10:49 15th June 2012