Bulls

Sasquatch says...

Something tells me that Ed&co have post synonyms?

Posted 00:48 21st April 2012

FoxandHound says...

Fair enough. Moving on. I don¿t see the point in having a ¿team of the week¿. Even when most of the player¿s chosen certainly have some talent allot of aspects have to be kept in mind. Like for instance who played who (no use in rating a player when his team is more superior to the team they played that day) and isn¿t the game played with 15 men in a team. My point being you¿re only as good as you¿re team mate (or the rest of you¿re team for that matter) allows you to be. For instance a flyhalf will have a pretty bad day at the office if his forwards don¿t give him good quality ball no matter how good he is. Same goes for a centre if his flyhalf makes bad decisions. So what¿s the point in picking players every week? Maybe a team at the end of a competition when everyone on all sides has played each other will be a better option.

Posted 19:52 19th April 2012

FoxandHound says...

@J4A I have already provided you with an answer. The matter of this being funny or not I cant help you with as it is entirely up to you But just in case you didn't follow the thread I'll repeat it for you

APV1 says...

@ Sasquatch - you might want to read my whole comment, not just pick single words. Perhaps those big feet of your get in the way...

Sasquatch says...

@AVP1: I've read the whole comment and it still sounds "mediocre", How do you know I have big feet if you've never seen them?

The emphasis here is on "if you've never seen them?"

my analysis of this is--

FoxandHound says...

Can anyone on this site claim that they have seen a real Sasquatch. Sasquatch/Yeti/Bigfoot is a mythical creator created by the imagination of ones mind therefore no one can claim that it has big feet for no one has or will ever see it. That said why would anyone choose to engage in an argument with something that only exists in ones imagination.

Now I hope this clarifies why Sasquatch feels he is intellectually superior to the rest off us for ¿catching¿ us all with such a ¿great retort¿ because non of us could see the humor behind the matter that he actually does not exist. May we move on now.

Posted 14:59 19th April 2012

Sasquatch says...

@Justice 4 all: uhhh... ok, back to the rugby I think, I don't visit this site to be abused over complete nonsense.

@Ed: please end this!

Posted 14:09 19th April 2012

FoxandHound says...

Can anyone on this site claim that they have seen a real Sasquatch. Sasquatch/Yeti/Bigfoot is a mythical creator created by the imagination of ones mind therefore no one can claim that it has big feet for no one has or will ever see it. That said why would anyone choose to engage in an argument with something that only exists in ones imagination.

Posted 12:18 19th April 2012

Sasquatch says...

@AVP1: LOL!I can tell you still don't get it!

Posted 11:46 19th April 2012

APV1 says...

@ Stellenbosched - many lives were lost in order for me to be promoted sop young. None were significant though - I used to command The Colonial Corps (basically Saffas, ANZACS and the odd chap from the Raj), so the soldiers were worth a lot less than the British Tommies! The gong cost a pretty penny, but was worth it. Have you rung me yet? My staff rarely let me know if there are nuisance calls, but I would love to hear the response if you ask for me by name... Go on, you know you want to...

"Sasquatch says... @AVP1: I've read the whole comment and it still sounds "mediocre", How do you know I have big feet if you've never seen them?" - Retort? Not really. Or, at least, a terribly poor one at best.

@ j4a - bless him. Big Foot is obviously confused. And I'll let you Saffas have the prize for "Best In Class - pathetic, drivelling contingent of excuse makers", if you let us have "Best In Class - our players lack exactly that - Class". We thought we had it in the bag from the RWC last year but, as they often do, the Kiwis gave us a good run for our money with Guildford's antics. Thankfully Hartley, Clark and Youngs really brought that one home for us. Fair deal?

@ Ed - I know. It's a rugby site. I'll go and get back in my box now.

Posted 11:13 19th April 2012

APV1 says...

@ Sasquatch / Yeti / Bigfoot - I was actually having a bit of a jibe against us lot up north. If you regularly read my posts, you'll have noticed that I'm not as dumb as I often appear and have a whole lot of respect for SH rugby, despite being English. That's why I was (again!) "hoping" for mediocrity, but thinking that, perhaps, the SH teams will give the tourists a hell of a match-up. My point was that there seems to be a lot of talent across all three nationalities, in all of the Super teams. There seems to be new names in the "Team of the Week" every week, showing that there's depth in all positions. Either that, or they are all equally rubbish. I was hoping for the latter, but suspect the former.

And please don't use a username if you don't know what it means - it just shows you up as having an IQ-deficit.

@ j4a - maths was never my strong point. I seem to come up with 42, which seems respectable enough..! ;-)

@ isthatrightref - I think you've called it right for Wales, although I wouldn't be too surprised if it was 2:1 to Wales... England might do ok, depending on our mid-week squad. And, of course, how much of a kicking the Saffas give us, as I'm expecting some very heated encounters. Ireland are likely to get munted, especially if their set-piece is still suffering. But they've got balls and heart, so you can never write them off.

Posted 10:28 18th April 2012

safehands says...

Here's a thought......the top 7 positions (this number worked out nicely I thought for the purpose of this comment....wonderful how one can manipulate data to meet one's own agendas :) ) are currently filled with 4 Kiwi teams (of which only the Chiefs have played anything remotely decent so far), 2 Saffa teams and 1 Aussie team....look out world when the Kiwi boys wake from their post RWC 2011 slumber...

Posted 04:50 18th April 2012

Sasquatch says...

@AVP1: I've read the whole comment and it still sounds "mediocre", How do you know I have big feet if you've never seen them?

Posted 19:26 17th April 2012