Planet Rugby

USA

USA

Schedule a hard slog - O'Sullivan

03rd October 2011 02:00

Italy v USA - Martin Castrogiovanni try

Taking its toll: O'Sullivan

USA head coach Eddie O'Sullivan revealed that the World Cup schedule was hard on the so-called minnows in New Zealand in September.

A series of battling defeats in the early matches gave way to increasingly one-sided scorelines as rugby's up-and-comers were repeatedly given only a few days' rest between games, while established nations played just once a week.

Tournament officials said the schedule was based on maximising TV revenues by allowing the best teams to play mainly at weekends, pointing out that millions of dollars were invested in minor nations' development.

But the controversy refused to die after outspoken Samoan centre Eliota Fuimaono-Sapolu compared the system to the "holocaust" and "apartheid", and several teams voiced their disapproval in less extreme terms.

"It does takes its toll, there's no question. It's a hard slog," said O'Sullivan, who experienced an easier draw when he guided Ireland in 2003 and 2007.

"When you get down to the back end of the pool games, a number of games in a short space of time, you pick up injuries, fatigue.

"All those games against tier ones (established teams) are real killers in terms of what they take out of the team physically and mentally, so I think we're beginning to see daylight appearing now in some other results."

The quarter-final draw is now made up exclusively of rugby's northern and southern hemisphere giants, despite a late charge by Pacific sides Tonga, who stunned France, and Samoa, who tested South Africa.

The International Rugby Board (IRB) released analysis after the first two rounds showing 'tier two' teams were catching up, with the points difference in their games against the big sides down to 29, from 42 in 2007.

But New Zealand, England, Australia, Ireland, South Africa and Wales then totted up a series of huge scores against struggling opposition.

James Robson, long-time doctor to Scotland and the British and Irish Lions, said teams needed a minimum of five days between games, but ideally between six and eight.

"I think to turnaround in international Test rugby now within four days is asking a great deal of the players that we are trying to care for," Robson said.

Samoa were particularly incensed when they had just three days off between their games against Namibia and Wales, against whom they then suffered their first ever World Cup defeat.

And Namibia's search for their first ever World Cup win was not aided by a punishing schedule of four games in 16 days.

"It's hard to play South Africa on Thursday and then have to play Wales on Monday. The turnaround was not suitable, not the most positive thing," said coach Johan Diergaardt, who returned to his day job after flying home.

However, Tonga rounded off the pool stages with a fabulous 19-14 win over France, while Samoa's fighting 13-5 defeat to South Africa was also a highlight although Fiji's campaign ended 66-0 at the hands of Wales.

France also had some nervy moments against both Japan and Canada, who impressed with some rugged displays as they beat Tonga and drew with the Japanese.

Japan's bid to be the "most improved side" was called into question as they yet again failed to win a game, extending a World Cup drought that stretches back to 1991.

And the former eastern bloc showed signs of things to come as Georgia beat Romania, and Russia scored tries against Italy, Ireland and Australia on their World Cup debut.

Comments

round15 says...

I'll agree with Eliota that the current playing schedule is unfair and all teams should get the same rest period, but unfortunately that would probably invole trimming the teams down to just 16 with 4 in each group, though i'd hope they do something similiar to Heinekn cup with top 5 and best 3 runners up qualifying.

The rest of Eliotas bitching just smacks of being a sore loser and one major chip on his shoulder. Perhaps he he is just frustated at their limitations and the fact he was a bit part player, only starting in the 1 game and only playing in just over 1 and half games. Perhaps he should have been shouting his gob off at his coaches..SQUAD ROTATION. You did take 30 players didnt you? They could have beaten Namibia with their 2nd 15 out & then they would have had plenty of rest. Doubt that it would have made any difference to the result though. Wales voluntarily played with 14 men at the end of the fiji game just to run a scenario of only having 14 players.

Posted 17:07 03rd October 2011

milesman1 says...

C'mon, the IRB is predominantly run by the 8 quarterfinal sides, and Scotland. They have the votes that make decisions.

However, I suspect that will change in the next decade, as the minnows continue to grow. Argentina finally got into the Tri-N's, and while they will struggle for a few years, they'll make an impact. With regards to E. Europe, Scotland and Italy are scared to death to allow a 'one-up-one-down' scenario with the other 6 Nations tournament.

And finally, the North Americans - it will happen. It would be great to see a combined US/Canada RWC in 2023, in order to get things really moving though.

Posted 12:34 03rd October 2011

rugbylover11 says...

@ sirjona

your question should be directed to the welsh players but in a different setting. something like this: "guys, why were you so nervous when playing the samoans?" hahahaha!!!!

Posted 09:10 03rd October 2011

sirjona says...

@eejbm what makes you so certain Samoa would have beat the Welsh, imo they were not even close to winning. Maybe you should be more concerned about the actions of your players twittering like petulant football players. Wales are the improved team they are through self discipline.

Posted 07:22 03rd October 2011

GoWalesGo says...

eejbm

sure they woud mate sure they would...

Posted 06:26 03rd October 2011

jonesy2 says...

schedule was a joke. probably the one and only sour aspect of this world cup so far. if anything the big nations should be given the less prep time but in honesty there are no reasons why they couldnt make it even prep time for everyone throughout the tournament.

Posted 05:36 03rd October 2011

eejbm says...

the draw does seem to be entirely unfair to these so-called minnows. Samoa would have beaten Wales if it had 7 days to recuperate from their match against Namibia.

Posted 05:22 03rd October 2011

snjsngh says...

minnows or tie1 nation every team needs to be given an equal fighting chance...if you disagree here is another point of view for you....tie 1 nations are more developed as they say then they are the ones who should be getting 3 to 4 days rest between games....even out the playing flied that's what every teams fans want....there is no pride in raking up points against teams who have already been wounded...on that note well done team USA for their sportsmanship against AUS...

Posted 04:26 03rd October 2011

5Lock4ward says...

@hayj05, Yes. The turnaround times were the same or very comparable at RWC '07 for the minnows.

Posted 03:24 03rd October 2011

hayj05 says...

Was it the same for the "minnows" at the 07 & 03 WC's?

Posted 02:38 03rd October 2011

Page 1 of 1

Character Count : 0/1900

  • USA Fixtures
Forthcoming Fixtures
FixtureDetails
All times are local
International Match
Saturday , June 8
USA vs Ireland01:30
More International Match fixtures
  • Table
Pool C
World Cup Table
PosTeamPPts
1Ireland417
2Australia415
3Italy410
4USA44
5Russia41