With the Six Nations combatants taking a well earned break last weekend, this week's Expert Witness changes its focus to the Women's Six Nations tournament. With the competition producing some unexpected results this season, we welcome England flank and superstar of the Women's game, Maggie Alphonsi MBE.
With England, formally a dominant force in the Women's Six Nations, showing a marked decline if not in form but in results, and with Italian ladies mirroring their male counterparts by defeating arch-rivals France, this years' tournament has thrown up a few shocks and surprises already. Alphonsi is quick to point out that, where England are concerned, their dip is almost by design rather than by accident.
"With the World Cup 7's tournament later on this year, the Management and Coaches have deliberately decided to remove 17 players from our EPS in order to place their focus on the Sevens World Cup. It does mean that we're fielding quite an inexperienced side in the Six Nations, but from our perspective, it also allows us to build to the next Women's 15 a side World Cup in 2014.
"Winning tournaments like that demands strength in depth, and we've been delighted by the reaction of a few of the players we've thrown in the deep end, so to speak!"
Two youngsters who have made a massive impression already are openside Hannah Gallagher and number eight Harriet Mills. Alphonsi welcomes the competition in her favoured back-row position:
"My injury, combined with the players removed from the EPS have given both Hannah and Harriet a real opportunity, and they've performed well. Having this level of competition in the squad keeps everyone honest. I realise that Hannah's displays mean I have to work extra hard if I'm to meet my comeback targets after my knee operation. I'm due back in a few weeks and am looking forward to it." (Alphonsi underwent surgery for a Meniscus tear in her knee earlier this season).
Ireland and France have both been very strong this season. In addition Italy have shown remarkable improvement and the competition seems very strong. What has caused the levelling of the playing field? Alphonsi believes that the Women's game is becoming more and more professional.
"France, Ireland and Italy have followed England's lead by investing intelligently and putting in place much tighter and progressive structures. The result is we're starting to see real athletes in the Women's game and even looking back 4 or 5 years, the fitness and power levels have increased significantly.
"If you take a team like Ireland, whilst they've always been a good side, they've made sure that the leading four provinces have the majority of their international players. As in the men's game, the Irish are very good at selecting known club partnerships. These players play together from a young age and that understanding shows," explained Alphonsi.
"Looking back at the results, Italy's commitment to improving their game showed when they took France in the opening round. However, I think Wales felt the French backlash when they beat them and nilled them fairly and squarely at home a couple of weeks later!" observed Alphonsi.
"The next round has some very interesting fixtures, but the Irish/French game stands out to me. It's a tough one to call, and it could turn out to be the championship decider, but Ireland have played well this year and will be a tough nut to crack at their home ground, Ashbourne RFC."
So it appears the Women's game is in rude health. The growth in the game is exponential, with an increase of over 104 percent in playing numbers in England in the last nine years. As England's ladies focus on the World Cups ahead, Alphonsi admits she's been thoroughly enjoying this year's men's Six Nations.
"It's been a tournament of very fine margins," she observed.
"England have a knack of winning the close games and winning them ugly if they need to, and that's a great habit and one all good sides have.
"There's much talk of a Grand Slam for England, but playing Italy is always a hugely physical encounter," she added.
"Italy take a lot out of the players. They are big and physical. England's first priority will be to win, but secondly to keep knocks and injuries down to a minimum.
"Scotland's turn around has also impressed me. They have a couple of high quality players in Stuart Hogg and Kelly Brown and those guys are leading from the front.
"Going back to England, I think that other sides in the competition have left their rebuilding for RWC 2015 slightly late. England are a year ahead in terms of blooding youngsters and knowing their best 23 players. Stuart Lancaster is picking from many options, depending on form, gameplan and fitness, and that's an enviable position to be in."
Alphonsi has had a long lay-off from the game. A meniscus tear in her knee required extensive surgery and has meant an enforced absence for the player they call The Machine.
"It's always important not to rush back in these situations. I'm comfortable with my progress and I expect to be playing in a reasonably short period of time, certainly this season," confirmed the Saracens flanker.
So that's it for this week's Expert Witness. For the next round of Six Nations games, it will be business as normal as we catch up with another legend of rugby to cast an eye over Round Four of the Six Nations.
Tickets are available for England's home match against Italy on March 9th, KO 1pm at Esher, here
Maggie Alphonsi spoke to James While







Comments
melkdave says...
A very inteligent colounm,and what M.Alphonsi says about the womens game is very true.More investment by Ireland ,France,and Italy showsin their teams better performances.While i believe England still have a big edge in the womens game ,the gap is closer than it was..Though missing 18 players from the EPS was a massive gamble,it will pan out in later years ,as new players are putting their hands up now,or now know just what leval of commitment and training is needed,for their future development.
Posted 18:47 06th March 2013
rugby_rockstar says...
Yeah APV1, the blooding of players is a tough road for those same players but just look at Mens Wasps team to see the future benefits.
Posted 14:53 06th March 2013
startledwombat says...
Good column. I'm particularly intrigued that it seems to take at least five years, and more often a little while longer, for a sports academy or similar intervention such as "tighter and more progressive structures" to reach its full effect. Things look very promising for England (Women's) for the future.
re APV1: >but I don't think anyone is of the illusion that we're a better team. Yet...
Umm, have a chat with Chris Ashton.
Posted 12:41 06th March 2013
APV1 says...
@ rugby_rockstar - I think you've hit the nail on the head, actually. England Women don't have enough players to have two squads, one for 15s and one for 7s, like the men. So they have to "share" some of the players.
There are positives, of course - the "blooding" of new players being an obvious one - but it does impact the results.
Whether they'll deliver the trophy is another thing altogether. Here's hoping!
Posted 12:36 06th March 2013
rugby_rockstar says...
I don't think there's much to say about england except that their weakened side does not detract from the performances of Ireland, France and Italy in any way. You can only beat who turns up on the day and then you just measure performance and you know whether the winner had a good game of not and Ireland and Italy are purring over the round three results. For england its all about the sevens and so after nailing their colours to the post its up to them to deliver a world cup, anything else will give rise to discussions about their six nations selection policy. I know this ups the presure on England but I doubt I'll be the only person to say this between now and the Sevens world cup.
Posted 12:16 06th March 2013
APV1 says...
First of all, it's good to hear her recovery is progressing well. I think she's been sorely missed in the 6N squad. Whether her presence would have changed the results, we'll never know. But one thing I do know is that she's just bloody awesome.
Other than that, the excerpt which stood out for me was this:
"Going back to England, I think that other sides in the competition have left their rebuilding for RWC 2015 slightly late. England are a year ahead in terms of blooding youngsters and knowing their best 23 players. Stuart Lancaster is picking from many options, depending on form, gameplan and fitness, and that's an enviable position to be in."
I think she is probably right with regards to the 6N teams, but globally I think we're still a few steps behind - NZ particularly. Yes we beat them in the Autumn, but I don't think anyone is of the illusion that we're a better team. Yet...
But we're heading in the right direction and at a good, steady pace. Whilst we all appreciate that there's still a lot of rugby between now and then and goodness knows what might happen, our prospects for 2015 and looking good.
Posted 12:08 06th March 2013