Planet Rugby

The British & Irish Lions

Morné Steyn sinks the Lions

27th June 2009 16:07

Morne Steyn British and Irish Lions Tour South Africa Second Test

2-0: Morné Steyn is mobbed

A last-minute penalty by Morné Steyn gave South Africa a 28-25 victory and 2-0 series lead over the British & Irish Lions in Pretoria on Saturday.

The Lions will head back to Johannesburg seething. They will likely fly back to Britain and Ireland still seething. And it's safe to say, Christophe Berdos will not have any cards with Joyeaux Noël write across it on Lions stationary any time soon.

How the French referee failed to send Schalk Burger off for gouging is beyond belief. Not only was Burger caught on the giant TV screens picking furiously at Luke Fitzgerald's eyes, but assistant Bryce Lawrence also caught the incident and reported it. Berdos thought for a minute, and chickened out ingloriously, telling Burger to keep his fingers to himself in future and dispatching him for ten minutes. It was a like a suspended sentence for a murder.

It had, for the sake of the game which is being increasingly blighted by this most cowardly of crimes, to be a red card. It was not.

In a match decided with the final kick, it was the ultimate turning point and it was in the opening minute. The likely subsequent citing and long ban will do nothing to remove the sour taste in the Lions' mouths, but Peter de Villiers' ridiculous and detestable denial of the offence - "Ach, it's sport, man, this is what it's all about" - after the game will merely exacerbate it - both to the British rugby public and, potentially, the world's.

Burger aside, Ronan O'Gara will also have to take a long period of deep introspection. The blood rushed in the final minute, and instead of settling for a kick to touch which would have secured the draw he launched a huge up and under, following it up with a hot-blooded mid-air shoulder charge on Fourie du Preez. Steyn had to land a kick from 55 metres, but in his home stadium and at altitude, it was always his to make. O'Gara should never have given that opportunity, certainly not in that fashion.

There were so many other talking points. Did the Lions have their game eviscerated by losing both props to injury in the 46th minute? The South African comeback after that point suggests so. Should JP Pietersen have been yellow-carded for his atrocious tackle on Rob Kearney shortly after Burger had returned? Most definitely. The Lions were no angels in a Test match of shuddering physicality, but the pick of the fouls - aside from O'Gara's - came from the men in green.

Enough of all that now though, instead, let's have a sift through the finest Test match all those lucky enough to be in Loftus have seen for some time.

In a rip-roaring first half, the Lions did everything they had to do, not only to take control of the game but to make the strongest statement possible to their hosts that this series would go all the way to the wire.

There was physical intimidation, a magnificent scrum against the head on their own five-metre line, an early try and a domination of possession that will have warmed the hearts of the coaching team who have made that kind of style their priority. By 25 minutes, the Lions had enjoyed a staggering 71 per cent of the ball in play and were good value for perhaps more than their 13-5 lead.

The Lions had heroes everywhere - no-one more so than 35-year-old lock Simon Shaw, whose magnificent Test debut gained its deserving reward when he was named man of the match.

South Africa kept themselves in the contest as Bryan Habana, his fellow wing JP Pietersen and substitute centre Jaque Fourie scored tries, the latter just six minutes from time following lengthy deliberation by Australian television official Stuart Dickinson.

Steyn added 10 points from the boot, while his namesake Francois slotted a long-range effort, and the Lions were thwarted.

It was a game that had everything, and is still not over for Springboks flanker Schalk Burger, who must surely be facing a disciplinary hearing on Sunday after he clearly eye-gouged Lions wing Luke Fitzgerald inside the first minute of the match.

Referee Christophe Berdos opted for a yellow card for Burger, who was winning his 50th cap, but television replays suggested it should have been red, with Burger now looking certain to be cited by the match commissioner.

The Lions cashed in on his 10-minute absence, taking the lead through a Jones penalty and then carving South Africa open by creating a quality try for Kearney.

Berdos had been forced to issue a warning just seconds before following a dust-up sparked by Springboks lock Victor Matfield, yet the Lions kept their focus.

Scrum-half Mike Phillips launched a blindside attack, and Jones' exquisite off-load freed Kearney, who finished majestically.

Jones' effortless touchline conversion put the Lions 10-0 ahead after they delivered a start in stark contrast to their efforts in Durban seven days ago.

South Africa needed an immediate response, and it arrived within five minutes when flanker Juan Smith and Du Preez combined from a lineout and Pietersen exploded through an inviting midfield gap.

Ruan Pienaar hit the post with an easy conversion attempt, before a second Jones penalty and a magnificent defensive Lions scrum under pressure underlined their colossal first-half improvement from last weekend.

The Lions were once again confident with ball in hand, and after going through the phases deep inside Springboks territory, Jones dropped a short-range goal.

It was impressively assured rugby from the Lions, and although Steyn booted a long-range penalty as half-time approached, South Africa still had it all to do at 16-8 adrift.

There were big problems for the Lions though within six minutes of the restart as props Jenkins and Jones both went off.

Jenkins clashed heads with Habana, and was forced off nursing a head wound, but worse was to follow when Jones suffered a serious-looking arm injury.

Lock Alun-Wyn Jones took over from his Ospreys colleague, with Andrew Sheridan replacing Jenkins, yet it meant uncontested scrums for the final 30 minutes.

A scoreless third quarter played into the Lions' hands, and the physical intensity of the match was further underlined when a collision between O'Driscoll and Springboks substitute Danie Rossouw ended with Rossouw going off just four minutes after joining the action.

O'Driscoll only lasted another two minutes though, making his exit after South Africa had cut the deficit in ruthless fashion.

Habana sprinted over for his 33rd Test try in 48 games, finishing off a rapier-like move, and substitute Steyn's conversion set up a gripping finish with the Lions leading 19-15.

Steyn then slotted a penalty that cranked up the pressure on the Lions, but the immaculate Jones quickly responded, making it 22-18 with 10 minutes left.

An injury to Roberts meant the Lions had to reorganise their back division, and they entered the closing stages with O'Gara at fly-half, Jones and wing Tommy Bowe in midfield and Fitzgerald and Shane Williams on the wings.

There was a sense of the Lions hanging on, and they relinquished their lead five minutes from time when Fourie squeezed in at the corner and Steyn booted the touchline conversion.

A draw would have been arguably the fair result - but Steyn had other ideas.

The scorers:

For South Africa:

Tries: Pietersen, Habana, Fourie

Cons: Pienaar, M Steyn

Pens: M Steyn 2, F Steyn

For the Lions:

Try: Kearney

Con: Jones

Pens: Jones 5

Drop goal: Jones

South Africa: 15 Frans Steyn, 14 JP Pietersen, 13 Adi Jacobs, 12 Jean de Villiers, 11 Bryan Habana, 10 Ruan Pienaar, 9 Fourie du Preez, 8 Pierre Spies, 7 Juan Smith, 6 Schalk Burger, 5 Victor Matfield, 4 Bakkies Botha, 3 John Smit (captain), 2 Bismarck du Plessis, 1 Tendai Mtawarira.

Replacements: 16 Chiliboy Ralepelle, 17 Deon Carstens, 18 Andries Bekker, 19 Danie Rossouw, 20 Heinrich Brüssow, 21 Jaque Fourie, 22 Morné Steyn.

British and Irish Lions: 15 Rob Kearney, 14 Tommy Bowe, 13 Brian O'Driscoll, 12 Jamie Roberts, 11 Luke Fitzgerald, 10 Stephen Jones, 9 Mike Phillips, 8 Jamie Heaslip, 7 David Wallace, 6 Tom Croft, 5 Paul O'Connell (captain), 4 Simon Shaw, 3 Adam Jones, 2 Matthew Rees, 1 Gethin Jenkins.

Replacements: 16 Andrew Sheridan, 17 Ross Ford, 18 Alun Wyn Jones, 19 Martyn Williams, 20 Harry Ellis, 21 Ronan O'Gara, 22 Shane Williams

Referee: Christophe Berdos (France)

Assistant referees: Bryce Lawrence (New Zealand), Vinny Munro (New Zealand)

TMO: Stuart Dickinson (Australia)

By Danny Stephens in Pretoria

Comments

ProudSaffer says...

Danny Stephens has to be one of the most one-eyed writers around. All week before the Test, writers like Moore, Ackford and Barnes had talked of the need for the Lions to start a fight to get their spirits up and disrupt the Boks. So they did ¿ whenever they could get away with it. O¿ Driscoll¿s attempted punch on Matfield, Sheridan¿s punch to Bekker¿s groin and continued attempts to goad Botha, Heaslip ¿falling¿ onto Pietersen after he scored and later shoving him It¿s obvious they were out to disrupt the Boks¿ game, got caught out, and now Stephens, Philips and the British press whinge like they always do. O¿ Gara¿s cynical mid-air tackle was dangerous and intentional but Stephens sees it as ¿hot-blooded¿. Another convenient and typical cop-out. Stephens saw Burger ¿picking furiously at Luke Fitzgerald's eyes¿. If so, he saw a replay not available to anyone else because replays showed Burger¿s fingers on Fitzgerald¿s face, yes, but ¿picking furiously at Luke Fitzgerald's eyes¿, come off it. I¿m not saying Schalk is innocent ¿ I¿m still not convinced he did it maliciously or intentionally - but Stephens¿ hysteria is insincere and one-eyed. ¿Fess up, boys, you tried it on and got caught out. Suck it up.

Posted 17:08 29th June 2009

gavin444 says...

has Danny Stephens played rugby before??

I'd expect this level of journalism in The Sun from the Junior Trainee Sports Editor's part-time assistant, not someone reporting on the biggest test of the year!

Posted 15:31 29th June 2009

kooper says...

This is getting really ridiculous:

"It was a like a suspended sentence for a murder"???

"but the pick of the fouls - aside from O'Gara's - came from the men in green"???

Your column sadly lost my attention from there on as this is clearly not unbiased reporting. No guesses which team you support Danny.

The Lions did play extremely well, both matches so far. But they LOST.

Not because the ref had it in for the Lions or because the Boks were playing dirty (the Lions transgressed as much as the Boks have, with the exception of Schalk Burger) or because the Lions got food-poisening or any other sob story you want to invent, but because the Boks simply outplayed the Lions. End of.

Now stop crying about it, accept defeat graciously and let's get down to the third and final match!

Posted 13:33 29th June 2009

rugbyrabbit says...

read the score and weep .... its the ref, its the rub of the green, its them dirty boks ... get over it. 30 men on the field for 80 mins ... score says 2-0, after two tests ... be man enough to face the failings of the team ... 71% possession and you can't cross the line for 35 minutes!! ... welcome to international rugby!

Posted 06:56 29th June 2009

mixedup says...

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE get rid of Danny Stephens.

I have been a loyal supporter of your web site since its inception, but I can no longer deal with the asinine, one-eyed vitriol that your 'reporter' serves up. This article is a prime example of the death of objective, informed and intelligent sports reporting (compare the excellent Dave Morris).

Sports reporting is not a soap opera. We do not want American football reporting WHERE EVERYTHING IS REPORTED IN A SHOUT. We do not want the 'red-top', tabloid, supermarket check-out line, self-indulgent, egotistical rantings that Mr Stephens believes to be good sports reporting.

Here is a list of words the 'reporter' (sic) used in reference to each side:

LIONS: were no angels; shuddering physicality; physical intimidation; magnificent scrum; Lions had heroes everywhere; carving South Africa open; Jones' exquisite off-load; finished majestically; colossal; immaculate

SA: gouging is beyond belief; picking furiously; suspended sentence for a murder; atrocious tackle; clearly eye-gouged

And this is reporting???

Please will you give a red card to Mr Stephens and let the rest of us enjoy the informed, objective, witty reporting that draws us all back.

(For reference, my rugby allegiances are :SA; England; Australia and the Lions.)

Posted 22:38 28th June 2009

Damo11 says...

Some of the press here have got it wrong. The Boks weren't all dirty, they were awesome. The Lions threw away a 19 v 8 lead and conceeded a point a minute for the last 20 minutes. Nobody is going to win a Test Match like that. Congratulations to the Boks. That said, the gouging was disgraceful, Berdos asked for help and both officials didn't have the balls to send him off. Not good. As for De Villiers comments, nothing needs to be said. I'd imagine John Smit was nothing short of embarassed by them. The Lions should have started playing from minute 1 in the 1st Test, and not imploded in the 2nd, then I'm sure I'd have celebrated another Lions Series win in South Africa. Roberts, Kearney and Croft have certainly left impressions. Monye was unlucky, victim of terrific Bok defence in the 1st Test. Burger should now be banned for the maximum permitted, I didn't really see the Botha incident so can't comment. But all said and done, I thought the Boks would win the series anyway, and will be a strong challenge in the Tri Nations.

Posted 20:39 28th June 2009

dirkie73 says...

Danny, you must be a lions supporter. Your report is such a joke. By the way, Morne did not sink the Lions, but the whole Springbok team did.

Posted 18:58 28th June 2009

tich says...

Calm down Mr Stephens. How can a referee red card a player in the first minute of one of the most important test matches of all time without seeing the incident first hand? The touch judge was some distance away and obviously felt he hadn't seen the incident well enough to recommend a red card outright. An epic test match would have been spoiled if they'd got it wrong, and any Lions victory would have been hollow against only 14 men. Burger deserves a lengthy ban if found guilty, which he should given the damning video evidence. He is a liability to the Boks and the Lions may even be hoping for his unlikely reprieve. Brussow is a much more dangerous opponent.

How can you say JP Pietersen ¿most definitely¿ deserved a yellow card for the tackle on Rob Kearney, when on TV replay, and as agreed by Sky commentators, it was obviously only a sloppy tackle without malice, deserving of a penalty at worst.

You seem to be very quick to jump to one-eyed conclusions unworthy of truly professional and balanced journalism.

Posted 18:10 28th June 2009

bruce says...

Ahh, the Springboks taking the series against the Lions. I remember it like it was yesterday.

Burger's challenge on Luke Fitzgerald was suitably moronic, and I've no doubt he'll miss a lot of rugby as a result of it. However to state "In a match decided with the final kick, it was the ultimate turning point and it was in the opening minute" seems a little exaggerated, especially as Fitzgerald showed no apparent after effects of the challenge for the next extra 80 minutes.

Indeed it precipitated a 10 point head-start to the Lions (they scored only 6 more points in the half hour after that, and only nine in total in the whole second half.)

As a rugby game I applaud Berdos for not flashing multiple yellows. It was an intensely physical game with no team giving an inch. Each side dished out massive tackles, the odd hand-bags-at-twenty-paces, and not surprisingly when operating so close to the edge, some contact was a little too enthusiastic. But despite the ferocity and the enthusiasm which Sheridan and Botha seemed to want to get together, it never felt like it degenerated into a brawl. It was rugby on the edge, sometimes over, but with both teams showing just how much they were prepared to give.

On a different day, with a different referee, we could have expected multiple yellow cards and the subsequent evisceration of a fantastic game. Had Burger got a red in the opening minute (as he probably deserved) the Lions would probably have won, but all spectators local, and foreign, would have lost.

The game was there to be won by either side, right up to the final minutes. It's top level rugby at it's very best. Yes one team won, but all 44 players on display showed what a fantastic game it can really be.

Posted 13:52 28th June 2009

gavin444 says...

after reading this article one might think the Boks were playing against 15 angels...??

Please can the moral crusade end in these kind of reports.!! 3-0 to the Boks!!!

Posted 12:22 28th June 2009

jcorbett says...

Sounds like Danny Stephens should change his nappy.....

Posted 01:35 28th June 2009

bubbleburster says...

Unbelievable. I have heard about one-eyed journalists but you take it to a new level.

Get over it Mr Stephens. You win tests by scoring tries and slotting goals not by whinging

and whining about the referee. There was plenty of give and take by both sides in this

match and to suggest the Lions were done in by South African brutality is ridiculous. Perhaps

the Lion midfield should learn to tackle - the two tries they conceded showed a pitiful

ability to tackle.

Posted 22:53 27th June 2009

cjmboot says...

Moaning about the ref! Hang on, I thought that was a no no. After all, when the All Blacks had to endure the most incompetent refereeing display by an international referee in years at the last World Cup, they were told to just suck it up and stop making excuses. What's changed in the meantime? Oh that's right. Its the British Isles on the receiving end so of course the rules have changed. Feeble hypocrisy.

Posted 20:41 27th June 2009

usarugby says...

Very very biased bit of journalism. The Burger eye gouge, albeit disgusting and a certain appropriate ban is forthcoming, did not cost the Lions the game. It was a self inflicting act that was inconsequential on the game, other than the 10 points and momentum it gave the Llions. Your sumary of this close fought test included the eye gouge in the beginning, middle, and end. As to your attack on Matfield...it was BOD who swung arms and carried on calling for a fight, BOD who tackled without arms and high on a player 6 inches taller than him, not to mention Sheridan who we couldn't notice when play was on, but was seen everytime play stopped getting into a fruckas, and yes taking a cheap swipe at Bekkers family jewels.

There was very good rugby for both sides and you failes to analyze that. You only made excuses for the Lions. Do you get paid to analyze rugby or advocate for the Lions?

Posted 18:45 27th June 2009

pieterv says...

In general I enjoy your coverage tremendously, but this has to be one of your most one-eyed pieces ever! The 'atrocious tackle' by Pietersen? Really? Looked like he did reasonably well avoiding Kearney given his momentum. I must have been following a different game. Did you keep an eye on Sheridan? Did you not see an offside charge by Bod on Rossouw. I think the Lions gave as good as they got. And the Boks were lucky to win this one. But stop the whinging please! Or have some cheese with it.

Posted 18:43 27th June 2009

Mack says...

Propaganda....There is not one mention to Lions foul play. Sheridan punching Andries Bekker in the groin. BOD taking on Victor Matfield when he had no business there. It is clear to me that the Lions were not going to take one step back (almost the Call 99) which caused much of the fracas at the break downs with players running in to shove the opposition. JP Pieterson's tackle on Rob Kearney was pathetic it was not even a tackle just a lazy arm after an attempted charge down. It barely warranted the penalty, shame on Kearney for going down like a footballer shame on Planet Rugby for writing such drivel to suggest a yellow card.Schalk Burger offence looked terrible. But if the Lions think that the only way they could win would be 14 against 15 for 80 minutes that is not Rugby. Schalk Burger's case will be reviewed and he will receive the appropriate penalty it did look nasty but he is a rugby man and I would hate to think eye gouging is part of his game. It has not been before in 50 test matches.

ROG behaved like a school boy after the Southern Kings game and again today.

Wel done to the boks for coming back after the 1st half and a yellow card.

To blame he ref. come on Planet rugby you have to do better than that leave itup to the players to whinge abot ref's decisions.

Posted 18:23 27th June 2009

oela says...

Hardly an objective view of game Danny! Sounds like sour grapes to me! Hard luck boet, Africa is a tough country!

Posted 18:14 27th June 2009

macjer says...

Mr Stephens

You are clearly of the opinion that the Lions can only win against 14 men . Of course I agree with you in that regard but luckily I am not such a sore loser as you. Please note that the assistant ref advised Mr Berdos, who did not see the incident, to give Schalk Burger a yellow card. If a dis com decide Schalk Burger gouged intentionally he will be banned liked any other player. Your inexplicably venomous words aimed at P de Villiers are also evidence of somebody who is extremely biased against the Springboks an SA.. Please try and be a little bit objective although no Englishman, Welshman or Irishman is apparently able to do so.

Posted 18:10 27th June 2009

stanjadema says...

Last week it was a great fight back from the Lions, this week its all about the sad loss. What about the comeback from the Boks this week??? - they were awesome to pull this back! Sure Lions had injuries, but they were throwing themselves into everything, what do you expect? BOD was lucky he didn't injure himself more - great commitment but narrow thinking - he could have tackled "properly" and still been on the field. Schalk Burger should be banned for at least a year - no place for that in this wonderful game!

Posted 17:22 27th June 2009

Page 1 of 1

Character Count : 0/1900